Below are four lessons on soccer attacking I’ve learned from the World Cup in 2010. World Cup:
1. The Best Soccer Attacking Style Mixes Short Passing and Long Balls. Germany as well as the Netherlands utilized a mix of long ball and short pass. Spain however was heavily criticized by media for playing an extremely short-passing game and not using sufficient long ball. It’s true that Spain had a win but did not win due to their offensive skills, they prevailed by virtue of their defense. They scored just eight goals in seven games, and the goal against the Netherlands was the result of the luck of the draw when a waist-high shot of Torres bounced off an Dutch defense, and not due to a planned attack. An analogy to American football is an opponent who only plays spbo live score or passes. We are aware that opponents would be able to adapt to the single-dimensional approach. The mix of attacks makes it difficult for the opponent to stay in balance.
2. The HTML0 Classic Soccer Counterattack is Beautiful and is a direct descendant of Goalkeepers. In the final goal against. Algeria, the U.S. attack began with a quick outlet throw by the goalkeeper towards Landon Donovan. Donovan was able to make a fantastic pass. The attacker on the ball was on the right side and a second attacker moved towards the Near Post, a Third Attacker ran towards the Far Post (both staying a couple of steps behind the ball, so they could watch the play and won’t be considered as offside) and Donovan left the play to get an extra rebound. This is precisely the way he scored. Germany has some stunning counter-attacks by the team against Argentina. For me, there’s nothing more stunning than a counterattack by a fast team.
3. If Your Soccer Team is Having Trouble Scoring, Remember How Spain Scored to Beat the Netherlands and Win the 2010 World Cup. It was the final minute of the match (26th second during overtime). There was no score. Spain was able to attack with a speedy counterattack that was initiated with Jesus Navas, a Winger who completed the 50 yard run carrying the ball coming from Spain’s defensive Third to approximately 10 yards over to the Halfway Line. The ball was thrown out of Navas to Dutch players. Dutch but the ball was passed to Iniesta who completed a back heel passing to Fabregas and then Navas who passed to Torres. (This caused Spain having four players within scoring range but being defended by six Dutch members.) Torres delivered a hefty flat drive, about waist high towards Iniesta however the Dutch player came ahead to stop the ball (the Torres pass was actually an unwise pass, which would have been in the direction of Iniesta and may have even been out of bounds). The Dutch player was unable to control the ball as the pass was heavy with a waist height. The ball sailed towards Fabregas who passed it on to Iniesta who scored. In the course of the game, even after he dropped the ball Jesus Navas kept attacking and was waiting to receive the ball from Fabregas and, after handing the ball over into Navas, Fabregas overlapped Navas and ran up to high on Navas’s Penalty Box to be in scoring range. This Movement Off the Ball created the chance to score. It is a lesson to remember that if you’re struggling to score, bring scorers to score and then send the ball towards them with force, and then hope for a fortunate break. In all the Spain’s possession game (they performed hundreds of quick passes, only a few long passes, and very few long running dribbling runs and played the ball with control during 64% of the game) they were able to win the game thanks to a lucky break caused through a 50-yard running dribbling streak, a hard line drive, a poor pass, and also because they had scorers who were in position to score. It’s clear that Torres did not anticipate that what would happen as it did, but his decision to pass the ball was the correct choice since an attempt to pass the ball that was on the ground could have been cleared, and the typical soft lofted pass likely would have be cleared. The waist-high hard ball provided an opportunity, in conjunction with the scorers being in positions to take advantage of the chance. The whole counterattack took about 25 minutes. This is another reason the reason why mixing things up is beneficial. The short-pass method isn’t more effective than a combination of long passes, as well as some lengthy running dribbling. Similar to the analogy in all sports. If you play the same offensive style of play all times (such like all of the long or short pass) it becomes more predictable and are easier to defend. In the final goal, Netherlands did an excellent job of defending. The goal was the result of two breaks that were lucky as well as Spain’s hustle, and movements off the ball. It wasn’t due to poor defensive play.
4. Attacking Support and Movement Off the Ball Are Necessary to Retain Possession. For the World Cup Final, Spain performed much better than the Netherlands in support for the attacking. There was always three or four players to support one of the attackers (the attacking player on the ball) within what seemed to be a distance of about 20 yards. The Dutch players were around 40 yards of the first attacker (possibly looking to make some space in their offensive). This meant that Dutch First Attacker was often forced to search for someone else who could pass the ball to (which slows the game) and when a passing was completed, it was usually snatched by Spain due to the distance that was required for passing was far enough. The match was a draw. Spain was in possession 64 percent during the game.